07 | Return-to-Work

Martin – Active Steps Toward Returning to Work

Martin had been a motorcycle enthusiast for most of his young adult life. Despite the risks, he had been both skillful and fortunate in avoiding accidents...until one mid-summer day when Martin was involved in a motorcycle collision. It was a devastating accident that he luckily survived.

Read more: Martin's Story

Assessment of Issues Related to the Back

As with every Rehab-Cycle®, an assessment that took into account the perspectives of both Martin (the patient perspective) and his rehabilitation team (the health professional perspective) was performed. For a clearer picture, the assessment also took into consideration the outcome and experience of the vocational rehabilitation (VR) process in the prior weeks.

Read more: Assessment

Two months after the intervention phase started in this Rehab-Cycle®, an evaluation of Martin's progress in the designated intervention targets revealed that he had made significant progress in multiple areas.

Read more: Evaluation

At the end of rehabilitation I really made some big gains  – independence in using the wheelchair, better self-care and being able to position my body...I also hope to get a car and be able to drive. The most important thing for me is to be able to work once I’m discharged. The support I’ve received [from the vocational rehabilitation counsellor] has been a tremendous help. I’m now even thinking of asking my old boss at the moving company if there is work that I could do there.

Martin, reflecting on his progress and his future

Read more: Discussion

  1. World Health Organization. Toward a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. [Internet] 2002. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed March 2015.
  2. Lidal IB, Huynh TK, Biering-Sørensen F. Return to work following spinal cord injury: a review. Disabil and Rehabil. 2007; 29(17): 1341-1375.
  3. Murphy G, Middleton J, Quirk R, De Wolf A, Cameron ID. Prediction of employment status one year post-discharge from rehabilitation following traumatic spinal cord injury: An exploratory analysis of participation and environmental variables. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41(13): 1074-1079.
  4. Stucki G, Brage S, Homa D, Escorpizo R. Conceptual framework: Disability evaluation and vocational rehabilitation. In: Escorpizo R, Brage S, Homa D, Stucki G. Eds. Handbook of vocational rehabilitation and disability evaluation: Application and implementation of the ICF. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 3-10.
  5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  6. Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Eisma WH. Vocational perspectives after spinal cord injury. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2005; 19(2): 200-208.
  7. Escorpizo R, Trenamann LM, Miller W. Spinal cord injury: Vocational rehabilitation and disability evaluation. In: Escorpizo R, Brage S, Homa D, Stucki G. Eds. Handbook of vocational rehabilitation and disability evaluation: Application and implementation of the ICF. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 239-61.
  8. Conroy L, McKenna K. Vocational outcome following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37(9): 624-633.
  9. Hess DW, Ripley DL, McKinley WO, Tewksbury M. Predictors for return to work after spinal cord injury: A 3-year multicenter analysis . Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 359-363.
  10. Tomassen PCD, Post MWM, Van Asbeck FWA. Return to work after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000; 38(1): 51-55.
  11. Krause J. Years to employment after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:1282-1289.
  12. Murphy GC, Young AE. Employment participation following spinal cord injury: Relation to selected participant demographic, injury and psychological characteristics. Disabil and Rehabil. 2005; 27(21): 1297-1306.
  13. Escorpizo R, Miller WC, Trenaman LM. Work and employment. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Noonan VK, Loh E, McIntyre A. Eds. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence, Vol. 4.0. Vancouver: Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence; 2012. p. 1- 22.
  14. Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Eisma WH. Participation and satisfaction after spinal cord injury: Results of a vocational and leisure outcome study. Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 241-248.
  15. Young AE, Murphy GC. A social psychology approach to measuring vocational rehabilitation intervention effectiveness. J Occup Rehab. 2002; 12(3): 175-189.
  16. British Association for Supported Employment (BASE). About supported employment. [Internet] Available from: http://base-uk.org/about/about-supported-employment. Accessed March 2015.
  17. Targett P, Wehman P, Young C. Return to work for persons with spinal cord injury: Designing work supports. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004; 19(2): 131-139.
  18. Ottomanelli L, Goetz L, McGeough C, Suris A, Sippel J, Sinnott P, Wagner TH, Cipher DJ. Methods of a multisite randomized clinical trial of supported employment among veterans with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009; 46(7): 919-930.
  19. Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injury: 2-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(4): 784-790.
  20. Hedrick B, Pape TLB, Heinemann AW, Ruddell JL, Reis J. Employment issues and assistive technology use for persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006; 43(2): 185-198.
  21. Miller W, Chan C. Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). [Internet] 1 February 2013. Available from: http://www.scireproject.com/outcome-measures-new/spinal-cord-independence-measure-scim. Accessed March 2015.

ICF Research Branch CoordinatorICF Research Branch in cooperation with the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI)

Swiss Paraplegic Research
Guido A. Zäch Strasse 4
6207 Nottwil (Switzerland)


Tel. +41 41 939 66 31
Fax +41 41 939 66 40
www.icf-research-branch.org
www.icf-core-sets.org

Swiss Paraplegic Research © 2018 All Rights Reserved